Mover Mike

From The Washington Times, Bush hits 'Islamic radicals' by Bill Sammon, we are finally getting down to what this war on terroeism is all about.

Mr. Bush felt it was time to reassert himself as the war's chief prosecutor and, for the first time, began to regularly substitute the term "Islamic radicalism" for terrorism. He also unleashed a scathing attack on Iran and Syria for their ongoing support of terrorism.

The president said Damascus and Tehran "share the goal of hurting America and moderate Muslim governments and use terrorist propaganda to blame their own failures on the West and America, and on the Jews." (emphasis added)

The American people have long known this to be true. That's why we don't understand why security frisks grandmothers and women with children in airline terminals. That's why we get nervous on planes when a group of middle eastern men ride with us. We profile and we don't understand why our government doesn't!

Bush Islamic radicalism

Disturbing report from Regime Change Iran: Iran was said to have designed a nuclear warhead for the Shihab-3 intermediate-range ballistic missile. DoctorZin then asks

So if Iran has the weapon design, the ability to produce plutonium and the means to deliver the bomb, what are they lacking?

Equally disturbing is Jack Wheeler's post WHY WAR WITH IRAN IS INEVITABLE

War is coming between America and Iran because the mullahs in Tehran see war as their only hope of keeping their power. They see war as the only way to prevent the coming democratic revolution that will sweep them away. They have convinced themselves that – get ready – that it is a war they can win, that Iran can militarily defeat the United States of America.

Iran Nuclear weapons