eXTReMe Tracker

Mover Mike

Mike is a retired stock broker, and now supports his wife's furniture business. He is her warehouseman, deluxer, and marketing guru. In addition, he writes poetry and finds abundance, health and joy in the world around him while pondering life's little mysteries

Inflation Targeting
During the hearing Regarding Ben Bernanke's Nomination to Be Chairman of the Board of Goverrnors of the Federal Reserve, Sen Sarbanes asked Bernanke why we should pursue inflation targeting when it seems to have failed so miserably in Europe. Bernanke answered in this way
Inflation-targeting comes in many flavors, as some countries have taken a more hawkish stance in terms of putting inflation first among equals or even first among the objectives of policy.

As I said, I subscribe entirely to the Humphrey-Hawkins mandate, which puts employment growth and output growth on fully equal footing with inflation in terms of the Federal Reserve's objectives.

Then the following exchange took place:
SARBANES: E.J. Dionne wrote, just a few weeks ago, "A Fed chairman who beats inflation at the cost of middle-income living standards will not be regarded as a success."

What do you think about that observation?

BERNANKE: Senator, I think it's a false dichotomy. I think that middle-income living standards and poverty, for that matter, are best addressed through strong, stable employment growth.

It's low-income people who suffer most from recessions. It's low-income people who suffer most from high levels of inflation.

The understanding that central banks currently have is that, by maintaining inflation at a low and stable level, avoiding a situation where inflation gets out of control — as it did, for example, in the 1970s — you can create more stable, more polished (ph), more substantial growth in employment.

I'm entirely in favor of maximum employment. I believe this is a method to achieve it. If I did not think it was, I would not pursue it

Now today, according to Bloomberg, Bernanke said
...stable prices are a ``prerequisite'' to achieving high employment and moderate interest rates.
[...]
Stable prices are desirable in themselves and thus are an important goal of monetary policy...
It appears he hasn't given up on inflation targeting. My question for Bernanke, how long can you keep the CPI from giving us the truth about inflation, buy bonds on the long end to keep bond holders happy and trade currencies like the Euro and Yen (Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker dissented from FOMC votes to authorize the New York Fed's trading of foreign currencies, including the euro and yen)? You have already lost control of the gold market, which is signaling something is wrong monetarily.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. The Mess that Greenspan Made
  2. Inflation Targeting
The Mess that Greenspan Made
Check out the blog The Mess that Greenspan Made in the post, Managing "Inflation" Expectations. Tim does an excellent job of delivering the meat of two news items.
The first item is Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's speech from about a week ago at Princeton on The Benefits of Price Stability. The other is a Welling@Weeden interview (PDF) with John Williams of Shadow Government Statistics notoriety.
Of particuluar interest to me is this from John Williams:
Real unemployment right now-figured the way the average person thinks of unemployment, meaning figured the way it was estimated back during the Great Depression-is running about 12%. Real CPI right now is running about 8%. And the real GDP probably is in contraction.
We are not getting much "bang" for all the bucks we are spending!

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. The Mess that Greenspan Made
  2. Inflation Targeting